5 things on Syria: Obama overseas to developments at home
President Barack Obama took his case for attacking Syria overseas and gained some momentum in the Senate, but his deputies faced another line of tough questioning from lawmakers about military involvement and Russia cautioned about unilateral U.S. action and sought to influence the political process in Washington.
Here are five things we learned from Wednesday's developments on Syria:
1) 'The world set a red line'
Obama headed for the
G-20 summit by first stopping in Sweden where he directed his pitch for
military action against Syria to the world leaders he will soon meet in
Russia.
The president challenged
other nations to join him in upholding global treaties banning the use
of chemical weapons, saying the red line he drew on that issue more
than a year ago should be recognized globally, not just by him.
Inaction on Syria, he
said, "becomes more dangerous not only for those people who are
subjected to these horrible crimes, but to all of humanity."
Secretary of State John
Kerry said there are a number of countries that have indicated they
would support some action against Syria if they believe the allegations
are true.
2) No escalation of conflict
On Tuesday, members of
the Senate Foreign Relations Committee made it clear they wanted no
ground forces to be part of any military action in Syria.
On Wednesday, their
House counterparts grilled Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and
Joint Chiefs Chairman Martin Dempsey at a hearing on the potential for
any U.S. military strike to escalate the Syrian conflict and require
additional American involvement.
Kerry stressed the limited nature of the proposed mission to degrade Bashar al-Assad's ability to deliver chemical agents.
But Dempsey, on
multiple occasions, had to say there were no guarantees. "I can never
drive the risk of escalation to zero," Dempsey said, though adding that
the limited scope of the strike and the U.S. partnerships in the region
"limit that risk."
3) Momentum for military action
The Senate Foreign
Relations Committee gave Obama some momentum on proposed military
action in Syria, but not before rewriting his plan. The panel voted
10-7 to move ahead with a punitive strike with Ed Markey -- Kerry's
replacement in the Senate from Massachusetts -- not taking a position.
The committee set a
60-day deadline for use of force, with an option for an additional 30
days. An amendment accepted by the panel from Republican Sen. John
McCain of Arizona and Democratic Sen. Christopher Coons of Delaware
added language to say the military response was intended to reverse
al-Assad's battlefield momentum, a stronger objective than the one
being pushed by the administration.
The White House
commended senators for swift action with polls showing that a majority
of Americans oppose a U.S. military strike.
Kerry told one House
lawmaker that he expects Obama to address the nation on military
action. Many members of Congress have been calling on Obama to make his
case directly to the public.
4) Putin weighs, Russia to lobby Congress
Russian President
Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday in an interview that he "doesn't
exclude" backing a U.N. resolution for military action, though only if
there is irrefutable proof Syria's government is behind the latest
attack.
Samples taken by U.N.
inspectors at that site were due at the world body's laboratories this
week and will be tested "strictly according to internationally
recognized standards," U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said.
Putin also said, in the
same interview with Russia's state Channel 1 television and The
Associated Press, that it would be "absurd" for al-Assad's forces to
use chemical weapons when they have the upper hand over rebel fighters.
The Syrian government
not only has denied waging chemical weapon attacks, it has accused
opposition fighters -- whom it routinely refers to as "terrorists" --
of using them.
A new wrinkle in the
lobbying equation is Russia, which said it sent an official request to
meet with congressional leaders to discuss Syria. A spokesman for House
Speaker John Boehner told CNN that he would not meet with the Russian
delegation.
5) The political calculation
So far, the politics of
seeking congressional approval have favored bipartisanship even though
it's far from certain whether Obama's wish for military action will be
approved.
The Senate Foreign
Relations Committee plan was put together and approved across party
lines, and in the House, the reception for Obama lieutenants at a
hearing on Wednesday was respectful. The only sharp exchange centered
around last year's Benghazi terror attack -- not Syria.
A White House statement
on the Senate committee action said America is stronger when "the
president and Congress work together" and promised to "build on this
bipartisan support" for limited military action.
This follows statements
on Tuesday by top leaders of the Republican-dominated House in support
of Obama's drive for military action. Of the congressional leadership,
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is alone in not supporting
Obama's call for military strikes. He says he's still undecided.
Most criticism or
concern from Capitol Hill has so far centered around the wisdom of the
mission or aspects of how it would be carried out.
There was, however, one
pointed criticism of Obama on Wednesday by House Foreign Relations
Committee Chairman Ed Royce, who said the president's policy on Syria
has been adrift for two years. Though, he followed up by saying there
were "no easy answers" on Syria.
No comments:
Post a Comment